I agree with [almost everything Mat Honan says in this article](http://www.theawl.com/2010/11/we-are-more-excited-about-girl-talk-on-everything-than-the-beatles-on-itunes) on the new Girl Talk album. The way the twitterverse went nuts for the album all at the same time is almost unprecedented now, in our time-shifted universe, where we all watch the *Lost* finale at different times.
> Even live media events are fractured, splintered through the lens of FoxNews or MSNBC or Autotune the News. It takes something huge to crash through the filters and clutter of modern life to get us to all experience the same thing simultaneously.
> The new Girl Talk, released on Monday, did that.
Except one thing. I just don’t ‘get’ Girl Talk
Like everyone else on the internet, I downloaded the new album to give it a whirl. I put it on my iPod and listened to it when I went for a run the other day. Halfway through the third song, I’d had enough. I deleted it from the iPod when I got home.
My problem is that in any given Girl Talk track, there are flashes of brilliance that then gets lost under a deluge of novelty. “Oh No”, the opening track on *All Day* is the perfect example of this. It starts off well. I mean… shit, Black Sabbath, 2pac, Jay-Z and Ludacris all working in perfect harmony? Then, before we have a chance to really enjoy this mix and for no apparent reason, it segues abruptly into Jane’s Addiction and Cali Swag District. And since we’ve already gone down an evolutionary dead end in this musical menagerie, why not throw in a bit of “Swagga Like Us”. It’s like putting makeup on this dead horse you’re flogging.
So yeah, I think Mat Honan is right about the ‘event’ nature of the new Girl Talk album, and I can admire that. But I also think it says a lot that the twitter hash-tag people are using is [#favoritegirltalk**spots**](http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23favoritegirltalkspots) and not [#favoritegirltalk**tracks**](http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23favoritegirltalktracks).